King Mohammed VI Faces Criticism Amidst Earthquake Crisis, Raising Questions About His Rule

BY: Hana Saada

Algiers, Algeria — King Mohammed VI of Morocco found himself at the center of a growing storm as he remained in Paris for more than 24 hours following the devastating earthquake that struck several regions in Morocco, leaving nearly 3,000 people dead. Critics note that his prolonged stay in Paris highlights a growing disconnect between the monarch and his suffering subjects.

Mohammed VI’s frequent absence from Morocco has long been a point of contention among his people. Many accuse him of spending more time abroad, particularly in Paris, than in his own country. Some report he indulges in luxuries and excesses, such as wine, that are a stark contrast to the struggles of his people.

The American newspaper The New York Times published an article that raised questions about the king’s activities during this crisis. It reported that he was captured on camera presiding over a cabinet meeting, but without sound. This lack of transparency has led to speculation about the timing of the meeting and his visit to a hospital to donate blood. Critics argue that these actions are merely attempts to project concern for a population that knows little about him.

Official Moroccan sources have asserted that the king has been closely monitoring the crisis since its onset. However, recent reports suggest that access to the monarch has become increasingly difficult. Observers refer to the king’s close relationship with Moroccan wrestler Abu Azaitar, whom he met around the time of his 2018 divorce, along with his two other brothers.

King Mohammed VI’s health issues, including an irregular heartbeat and acute viral pneumonia, add another layer of mystery to his life inside the royal palace. Courtiers and family members vie for his attention, fueling speculations about the succession to the throne.

Moroccan voices and elites have criticized the government’ sluggish response to the earthquake. Many believe that the government is reluctant to take significant action without explicit permission from the king. His association with the Zaitar family, who sometimes accompany him on trips and commercial projects, has raised concerns within the royal court.

The king’s apparent detachment from his people is a recurring theme. He seldom addresses questions about his country and its citizens, preferring prepared speeches that do little to bridge the gap between him and the public.

Returning to the earthquake, the aftermath revealed the Makhzen’s bureaucracy that hindered citizens in affected regions from burying their dead. Helicopters were used to drop bodies wrapped in inadequate supplies, leading to heartbreaking scenes.

The international community responded swiftly to the crisis, offering sympathy and aid. However, the Moroccan authorities rejected many offers of assistance, citing concerns about chaotic results. Critics argue that this stance is driven by a desire to maintain a facade that conceals the dire realities faced by many Moroccans.

The Makhzen’s reluctance to accept international aid has drawn attention to the plight of residents in remote villages who lack essential services like schools and hospitals. The delay in releasing accurate figures of casualties reflects a lack of comprehensive population data in affected areas.

Furthermore, the fate of foreign tourists who perished in the earthquake remains shrouded in uncertainty. The Makhzen’s refusal of foreign aid has compounded its difficulties in reaching the affected areas and managing the crisis effectively.

In a perplexing turn of events, the Moroccan government’ stance on the international stage has raised concerns. Its perceived submission to outside influences, particularly the Zionist entity, has sparked fears of repercussions on both local and international levels. The king’s prolonged absence and the government’s response to the earthquake have cast a shadow over Morocco’s image on the global stage.

As Morocco grapples with the aftermath of the devastating earthquake, the spotlight remains firmly on King Mohammed VI and the government’s handling of the crisis. The events surrounding this disaster have exposed a rift between the monarchy and its subjects, raising questions about the king’s leadership and the country’s future.