Moroccan Journalist Dounia Filali Challenges the Timing and Credibility of Netanyahu’s Backing for Alleged “Moroccan Sahara”
BY: Hana Saada
ALGIERS- In a startling revelation that has sparked widespread debate, the prominent Moroccan opposition journalist, Dounia Filali, has shed light on the actions of Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has taken the controversial stance of recognizing the alleged Moroccanness of Western Sahara. Filali asserts that this recognition, portrayed as a personal confession, directly contradicts the standing UN resolution on the matter, raising serious concerns about its implications on the delicate regional dynamics. Compounding the intrigue further, these developments have occurred amid Algerian President Tebboune’s significant visit to China and the European Union’s decision to terminate the fishing agreement with the Makhzen. With such intriguing coincidences at play, Filali has posed thought-provoking questions, urging the public to delve deeper into the motivations and potential ramifications of these actions on the political landscape in the region.
Filali’s incisive analysis raises pertinent questions about the intricate web of international relations and hidden political agendas that may be at play behind the scenes. Netanyahu’s recognition, drawing parallels with the scenario of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s tweet on Western Sahara, has ignited a flurry of discussions and debates on the matter.
In her recent tweet, Filali underscores that the timing of this recognition coincides with Algerian President Tebboune’s visit to China. This convergence raises eyebrows and leads to speculation about the possibility of political maneuvering behind closed doors. As regional powers engage in complex diplomatic endeavors, Filali emphasizes that the timing of such statements is critical and cannot be easily brushed aside as a mere coincidence.
Another significant event that coincided with the recognition was the termination of the fishing agreement with the Makhzen by the European Union. Filali points out that this move, seemingly unrelated at first glance, may hold deeper implications.
Besides, Filali’ skepticism arises from the fact that such recognition has no basis in international legality and goes against the long-standing position of the United Nations and the international community. Western Sahara has been recognized as a disputed territory, necessitating a just and lasting resolution, rather than any unilateral declarations of sovereignty.
Of particular concern is the Zionist entity’s intention to establish a consulate in Dakhla, a move that blatantly disregards the non-autonomous status of the occupied territories and undermines international law. The decision appears to be nothing more than a questionable alliance between individuals and entities known for challenging the authority of the United Nations Security Council.
The international community must not be swayed by such recognition, as past endeavors like the “deal of the century” and Trump’s controversial tweet have demonstrated their short-lived nature and lack of a viable future. The focus must remain on the realities on the ground in Western Sahara and the urgent need for a just and inclusive resolution to the conflict—one that upholds the principles of self-determination and international law.
